EBQ:Antibiotic prophylaxis for mammalian bites: Difference between revisions
(EBQ) |
(EBQ) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==Study Design== | ==Study Design== | ||
*Systematic review of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials | |||
*Studies were reviewed by two reviewers | |||
*8 studies included | |||
==Population== | ==Population== | ||
===Patient Demographics=== | ===Patient Demographics=== | ||
Revision as of 01:16, 1 November 2014
incomplete Journal Club Article
Medeiros I., Saconato H.. "Antibiotic prophylaxis for mammalian bites". Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001. 2(CD001738):.
PubMed Full text PDF
PubMed Full text PDF
Clinical Question
Is the use of prophylactic antibiotics for mammalian bites effective in preventing wound infections?
Conclusion
Antibiotic prophylaxis after human bites and bites of the hand may decrease the risk of wound infection but further evidence is needed. No evidence shows effectiveness in the use of antibiotic prophylaxis after cat or dog bites.
Major Points
Study Design
- Systematic review of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials
- Studies were reviewed by two reviewers
- 8 studies included