Template:PERC rule - Revision history

ClaireLewis at 14:16, 13 October 2019

2019-10-13T14:16:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 13 October 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	===PERC Rule Calculator===		===PERC Rule Calculator===
	~~<quiz display=simple>~~		Check all of the following that are true:
	{Check all of the following that are true:
	~~\|type="[]"}~~

	+Age <50yr		*Age <50yr
	+Pulse ox >94% (room air)		*Pulse ox >94% (room air)
	+HR <100		*HR <100
	+No prior PE or DVT		*No prior PE or DVT
	+No recent surgery or trauma (within prior 4wk)		*No recent surgery or trauma (within prior 4wk)
	+No hemoptysis		*No hemoptysis
	+No estrogen use		*No estrogen use
	+No unilateral leg swelling		*No unilateral leg swelling
	\|\|In patients with low suspicion for [[PE]] (best-guess pre-test probability <15%) AND all are true, only 0.9% had [[PE]] (n=7527) and it can be ruled-out without further testing (i.e. no need for d-dimer)<ref>Kline JA, et al. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 1247–55.</ref><ref>Kline JA, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 772–80. (PMID: 18318689).</ref>
			In patients with low suspicion for [[PE]] (best-guess pre-test probability <15%) AND all are true, only 0.9% had [[PE]] (n=7527) and it can be ruled-out without further testing (i.e. no need for d-dimer)<ref>Kline JA, et al. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 1247–55.</ref><ref>Kline JA, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 772–80. (PMID: 18318689).</ref>

Rossdonaldson1 at 18:16, 18 February 2015

2015-02-18T18:16:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 18 February 2015
Line 12:		Line 12:
	+No estrogen use		+No estrogen use
	+No unilateral leg swelling		+No unilateral leg swelling
	\|\|In patients with low suspicion for [[PE]] (~~clinician's~~ best-guess pre-test probability is <15%) AND all are true ~~("PERC negative")~~, only 0.9% had [[PE]] (n=7527) and it can be ruled-out without further testing (i.e. no need for d-dimer)<ref>Kline JA, et al. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 1247–55.</ref><ref>Kline JA, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 772–80. (PMID: 18318689).</ref>		\|\|In patients with low suspicion for [[PE]] (best-guess pre-test probability <15%) AND all are true, only 0.9% had [[PE]] (n=7527) and it can be ruled-out without further testing (i.e. no need for d-dimer)<ref>Kline JA, et al. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 1247–55.</ref><ref>Kline JA, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 772–80. (PMID: 18318689).</ref>

Rossdonaldson1 at 18:15, 18 February 2015

2015-02-18T18:15:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 18 February 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
			===PERC Rule Calculator===
	<quiz display=simple>		<quiz display=simple>
	{Check all of the following that are true:		{Check all of the following that are true:

Rossdonaldson1 at 18:14, 18 February 2015

2015-02-18T18:14:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 18 February 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<quiz display=simple>		<quiz display=simple>
	{~~Which~~ of the following are true:		{Check all of the following that are true:
	\|type="[]"}		\|type="[]"}

Rossdonaldson1 at 18:14, 18 February 2015

2015-02-18T18:14:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 18 February 2015
Line 11:		Line 11:
	+No estrogen use		+No estrogen use
	+No unilateral leg swelling		+No unilateral leg swelling
	\|\|If all are true ("PERC negative"), only 0.9% had [[PE]] (n=7527) and ~~in patients with low suspicion,~~ it can be ruled-out without further testing (i.e. no need for d-dimer)		\|\|In patients with low suspicion for [[PE]] (clinician's best-guess pre-test probability is <15%) AND all are true ("PERC negative"), only 0.9% had [[PE]] (n=7527) and it can be ruled-out without further testing (i.e. no need for d-dimer)<ref>Kline JA, et al. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 1247–55.</ref><ref>Kline JA, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 772–80. (PMID: 18318689).</ref>

Rossdonaldson1 at 18:09, 18 February 2015

2015-02-18T18:09:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:09, 18 February 2015
Line 11:		Line 11:
	+No estrogen use		+No estrogen use
	+No unilateral leg swelling		+No unilateral leg swelling
	\|\|If all are true ("PERC negative"), only 0.9% had [[PE]] (n=7527) and in patients with low suspicion ~~for [[PE]]~~, ~~[[PE]]~~ can be ruled-out without further testing (i.e. no need for d-dimer)		\|\|If all are true ("PERC negative"), only 0.9% had [[PE]] (n=7527) and in patients with low suspicion, it can be ruled-out without further testing (i.e. no need for d-dimer)

Rossdonaldson1: Created page with " {Which of the following are true: |type="[]"} +Age <50yr +Pulse ox >94% (room air) +HR <100 +No prior PE or DVT +No recent surgery or trauma (within pri..."

2015-02-18T18:08:07Z

Created page with "<quiz display=simple> {Which of the following are true: |type="[]"} +Age <50yr +Pulse ox >94% (room air) +HR <100 +No prior PE or DVT +No recent surgery or trauma (within pri..."

New page

<quiz display=simple>
{Which of the following are true:
|type="[]"}

+Age <50yr
+Pulse ox >94% (room air)
+HR <100
+No prior PE or DVT
+No recent surgery or trauma (within prior 4wk)
+No hemoptysis
+No estrogen use
+No unilateral leg swelling
||If all are true ("PERC negative"), only 0.9% had [[PE]] (n=7527) and in patients with low suspicion for [[PE]], [[PE]] can be ruled-out without further testing (i.e. no need for d-dimer)